HomeUsergroupsRegisterLog in

Share | 

 Warhammer 40K Editorial: Building Lists Last?

Go down 
Hand of Dume


Posts : 1581
Join date : 2010-06-19
Age : 48
Location : Wastelands of Miami County... ie Tipp City

PostSubject: Warhammer 40K Editorial: Building Lists Last?   Sat Apr 16, 2011 10:46 pm

Warhammer 40K Editorial: Building Lists Last?

I want to open a discussion on how we can try and rebalance Warhammer 40k without major change to the armies.

Anyone who has played Warhammer 40k knows that the game is not balanced. Anyone who has played Warhammer 40k competitively really knows that 40k is not balanced. 40k is, by and large, a game of paper, scissors, and rock, which in itself is not such a terrible thing. We all love the game (or at least most of us), and we all still play it. But, that doesn't make it any less frustrating when you bring your favorite army to bear, bring the wrong list, and lose the game from the start. This lack of balance is what leads us to seeing the same armies and lists at tournaments. This is what causes us to not play some armies and units that we love, in favor a unit that will actually win us the game.

Most of the frustration with 40k's balance stems from building a list, which the entire game now seems to hinge on. On occasion, the skill of the player has the ability to make up for weaknesses in a list, but cannot always compensate. The other disparity arises where one army is superior based on the mechanics of the game itself. You opponent may bring an overwhelming amount of tanks or troops that you will simply not be able to conquer. Some armies are naturally better than others, which is fine and actually offers up a challenge for those of us who like the more finesse armies. But, that does leave us at the crossroads of what we like, and what will ultimately work. There are many weapons and units that almost never get used because you simply cannot rely on them in all cases.

In tournaments, you have to try and build a list that can handle all eventualities. You have to be able to handle any mission and opponent that come your way. This is a double edged sword. It forces the player to try and make the most balanced list that will work in all circumstances, but at the same time it hurts armies that are not capable of that. Not all armies are Space Marines. Some armies need to know what they are up against to bring the units they need.

There is a simply way to fix all these issues and without drastically changing the armies or the way the game is played. It is simply a rearrangement of order of operations. The current system requires you to write your list, and then find out your opponent and then your mission. I propose a more logical, and not to mention advantageous, reordering of the order of operations. First, the players state what armies they will be playing. Then, the players would roll for missions and objectives. With this knowledge, the players would then write a list to best accomplish their goals. Imagine a general who knows that he needs to bring his troops to an area but has no idea who he is fighting or what the reason is. That is asinine. A general knows his enemy and the reason for going to an area before he goes there. This is a quick and easy fix to help restore balance to the game.

Writing your list last would allow the player to use their army to its best effect. It would protect you from losing the game before it even begins. The best part is that it still allows you the element of surprise and still forces you to write a balanced list.


Let's just play the friggin' game and have some fun!
Back to top Go down


Posts : 755
Join date : 2010-06-19
Age : 45
Location : Somerset, KY

PostSubject: Re: Warhammer 40K Editorial: Building Lists Last?   Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:19 pm

It would be more beneficial to know your foe. And just about every storyline in this game has a mention of who is suspected in certain areas and most of the time it is confirmed before any Marines or whoever lands to handle the situation. If you gear up to fight certain enemies it is much more in your favor for a victory. However at a tourney setting this is alot harder to prepare for. Some armies just have a harder time dealing with all comers. And yes, it sucks when you draw that one opponent at the tourney that you know you are going to have trouble with because you brought these selections from your codex instead of those selections.

Last edited by Wayno on Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down


Posts : 1428
Join date : 2010-06-20
Age : 44
Location : Centerville, OH

PostSubject: Re: Warhammer 40K Editorial: Building Lists Last?   Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:09 pm

This article leads into a sidebar list. In an 1850 tourney you might have 1 or 2, 250 or 350 pt side bar to choose when you get to the table.

CCG's have them, but it would be challenging to oversee in a 40k tourney perhaps.

Declaring Martial Law - FTW
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content

PostSubject: Re: Warhammer 40K Editorial: Building Lists Last?   

Back to top Go down
Warhammer 40K Editorial: Building Lists Last?
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» a flood and falling building
» Building Permit
» Wedding in old dorm building
» Building Management and Security
» A Tsunami coming and building a shelter underground.

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Martial Law :: 40k Articles and Editorials-
Jump to: