HomeUsergroupsRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 40K: The MAX in Min/Max

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
Hand of Dume

avatar

Posts : 1581
Join date : 2010-06-19
Age : 47
Location : Wastelands of Miami County... ie Tipp City

PostSubject: 40K: The MAX in Min/Max    Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:32 am


via BoLS:

40K: The MAX in Min/Max


Blogosphere pundits never seem to tire of extolling the virtues of MSU builds, but how often do we discuss the alternative?


The HBU.

The (drumroll please) Honking Big Unit!


Not sure that will catch on anytime soon, but let's agree to roll with it for the purpose of this article.

Some definitions are in order. The term MSU means 'Multiple Small Unit' and refers to a philosophy of maximum points efficiency. Units are lean and mean, generally taking advantage of undercosted or inexpensive units that can then be copied multiple times across a Force Organization slot.


You can read 'copied multiple times' as 'spamming,' yet another Blogosphere term you're almost certainly familiar with, being the loyal reader of this site that you are!

Here's an example of a fairly standard MSU build:


Space Wolves, 1500 Points

Rune Priest; Living Lightning, Murderous Hurricane, Melta Bombs: 105

Wolf Scouts: 5-strong, Melta Gun: 85

Grey Hunters; 5-strong, Melta Gun with Las-Plas Razorback: 155

Grey Hunters; 5-strong, Melta Gun with Las-Plas Razorback: 155

Grey Hunters; 5-strong, Melta Gun with Las-Plas Razorback: 155

Grey Hunters; 5-strong, Melta Gun with Las-Plas Razorback: 155

Grey Hunters; 5-strong, Melta Gun with Las-Plas Razorback: 155

Grey Hunters; 5-strong, Melta Gun with Las-Plas Razorback: 155

Long Fangs; 5-strong, Missile Launchers x4 with Las-Plas Razorback: 190

Long Fangs; 5-strong, Missile Launchers x4 with Las-Plas Razorback: 190




I've copied the squads to bring home the point of the 'multiple' in Multiple Small Units. There are nine infantry squads and eight Razorbacks - so eighteen (18) units, including the Rune Priest. Obviously the potential is there to give up a lot of Kill Points if things go south, but in practice it can be hard to collect the points.


Why? Brother, there are eight Lascannons and Missile Launchers shooting at range starting Round One! Not to mention d6 Strength 7 lightning bolts, just for the frosting. Just as obviously, things get pretty grim inside of 24-inches and positively brutal at 12.


Er... do I need to point out its pretty spammy? (Don't miss Reecius' fantastic article on the subject, linked here!)

Army purists will cry foul at the lack of originality, but the player will probably say something like, "How can you say that? I've filled the Troops slot!"

Bah! Who cares? I don't, and that's not really the focus of this article. Or at least, only peripherally. Nor am I trying to advocate for MSU builds...

...they're fine, they work - and again, who cares? We've read it all before!

Let's flip this puppy around; is the opposite workable?

If the opposite of trim and points efficient is bloated and unmanageable, then we're not really on to anything great yet. But MSU works because there is an inherent strategy in the build...


...the 'min' in Min/Max. While we can't turn the concept on its head, tweaking it a bit by occasionally including a large unit or two to anchor an army has produced results in my games over the years.

Enter the HBU! A Honking Big Unit makes a virtue of its size and survivability to soak shots, tie up units, and hold advanced objectives.


Daemons! Still by far my favorite army, and it's how I cut my teeth writing for Bell back in 2010.

My standard optimized list used 5-strong Plaguebearers or Pink Horrors, for pretty obvious reasons. The former was widely considered the best option in the book, and only considered useful for going to ground on objectives. I didn't give it any thought beyond that until Da Boyz in Rochester, New York the year before last. Being a 'comp' event, my list included a larger than normal squad of 'Bearers - my sad nod to fluff.


The unit blew my expectations out of the water! The 'Bearers played strong-center to the army and were useful in every game. Well, except the embarrassing beat down Greg Spark's Footdar handed me, but those tears are dry.


Excuse me for a moment.


Being hardheaded, I chalked it up as an anomaly and didn't learn a thing. But some synapses must have fired off, because I dusted off the idea in last year's Hard Boyz tournament as an answer to a 'grab-the-center' mission.


Again, the unit of 15 'Bearers over-performed in every mission! It was the Swiss Army knife of the army, capable of filling in a number of roles. They created space, held objectives, tied up stronger units... and just never, ever went away easily.


Recently I've been applying the same concept to the Necrons, where my Troops are filled out by one squad of 20 Warriors, one squad of 10 Warriors, and two squads of 5 Immortals.

I toyed with some ideas on paper and in play-testing, but the real test came over the weekend in a local tournament. Suffice it to say, the 20-strong Warriors exceeded my expectations in the same way the Plaguebearers did.

And for the same reason! I think it boils down to two reasons:


Large units are less susceptible to bad luck. Your opponent has to apply more resources across more turns to put away a HBU. With a largish sum of models at hand, chances are a lucky round of shooting won't put them away. Lady Luck should look away by the following round and things will even out.

Large units are less susceptible to good dice. Wait, what??


If you think like me, you don't want good dice - you want average dice! A lucky round of shooting can make any crap unit seem great; alternatively a bad round of cover saves can seem overly frustrating. Thing is, you can't really count on either of these.


I'll take nice and predictable, thank you! Luck comes and goes, but dependable... that you can count on.


Dependability is important, but the Plaguebearers and Necron Warriors both work for HBU's because they share a key characteristic: survivability! The former have a Toughness 5, Feel No Pain, and an Invulnerable Save; the latter aren't quite so good, but then they aren't expected to perform in close combat. Still, Reanimation Protocols make even a humble 4+ save seem pretty great.


Not every HBU uses special rules for its effectiveness. The standard Ork Mob has strength in numbers. Cannon fodder has its place, after all.


And keep in mind, Lascannons become a lot less impressive when shooting Infantry models in cover!

Here's a last thought on the advantages of the HBU: Kill Points denial. Some builds can take advantage of a low unit count to play spoiler in Annihilation. Just ask Paladins how effective that can be! You'll know you played into this tactic if your opponent starts griping about winning on Victory Points but losing the game to Kill Points... usually launching a diatribe about how KP's 'killed the game.'

As always, play the objective! Just nod and chalk it up to luck - it doesn't cost you anything.

...

This has been a rather generalist article, but it's important to mention that each HBU I've included had a purpose, a role in the strategy of the list. Build with a purpose in mind! Randomly dropping points on anything isn't a great idea.

For example, in the Necron Warriors mentioned in this article included an attached Crytek with Veil of Darkness. The purpose behind the numbers was making sure the unit could not only punish the enemy with Rapid Fire Gauss but survive after the Deepstrike that got it there!

_________________
MARTIAL LAW- FTW

Let's just play the friggin' game and have some fun!
Back to top Go down
Edge

avatar

Posts : 1428
Join date : 2010-06-20
Age : 44
Location : Centerville, OH

PostSubject: Re: 40K: The MAX in Min/Max    Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:25 pm

I like it and I use it.

_________________
Declaring Martial Law - FTW
http://40k-edge.blogspot.com/
Back to top Go down
http://40k-edge.blogspot.com/
painnen
Guest



PostSubject: Re: 40K: The MAX in Min/Max    Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:08 pm

I think the most pertinent part of this article is Kill Point denial and abuse of USR's.

There are just as many or more reasons not to run big squads as opposed TO running large squads. The two off the top of my head are transport denial (over compacity) and easy of being multi-assaulted due to oversized footprint.

It's all magnified when you plop down 20 said warriors and get stuck in HtH. You obviously have to enhance the squad with futher points/upgrades to make that chubby squad viable. I bad LD check and POOF! You lose the squad, the IC, and the attached sub-IC's for up to 3KPs, making the advantage of low KPs a moot advantage.

Back to top Go down
Wayno

avatar

Posts : 755
Join date : 2010-06-19
Age : 44
Location : Somerset, KY

PostSubject: Re: 40K: The MAX in Min/Max    Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:58 pm

Either way, that is a very tough list to beat at 1500pts.

Spammy? Yes.

Effective? Very.

In game terms I love that list. In Space Wolf fluff terms, I don't think it lines out.

However, if it is legal in the Codex it is all good.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: 40K: The MAX in Min/Max    

Back to top Go down
 
40K: The MAX in Min/Max
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Martial Law :: 40k Articles and Editorials-
Jump to: